Meadow’s Hierarchy

The order of the above ‘leverage points’ is not arbitrary. The sequence is based on the work of systems theorist Donella Meadows. Meadows suggested that there is a hierarchy to these points. The leverage points on the top are relatively easier to implement, but tend to have less impact in the system. Conversely, the farther down the list you go, both the difficulty of intervention and the systemic ‘payoff’ increase in turn.

Let’s look at the list again:

Meadow’s hypothesis is that changing dials and knobs — budget lines, the heading font on office memos, and so — are fairly easy to do, but they have little consequence. On the other hand, if you can influence the paradigms or goals of the system, the impact can be seismic.

Where will you prioritize your efforts?

Cite this page:
Shelley, James. (2020). 'Meadow’s Hierarchy' (in System Thinker Notebook). Originally published on August 5, 2020. Accessed on September 29, 2020. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permalink:
Additional reference and meta data:
This page is currently a subsection of 'Leverage Points' in the System Thinker Notebook manuscript. Structure and document location subject to change. Use as permanent identifier for this document if linking externally.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.